(Doug Pensinger/Getty Images) |
By Chris Carelli | @Chris_Carelli
-- This column was originally written for the September issue of Big Leagues Monthly | Magazine. --
The use of
performance enhancing drugs (PEDs) is a major issue in sports, but this is a
baseball magazine so I’m going to focus my efforts on trying to determine why
professional baseball players still get caught taking these drugs after
everything the sport has endured since the 2007 Mitchell Report.
There are
many forms of PEDs, but the most typical of the bunch linked to baseball are
anabolic steroids, typically testosterone, though designer synthetic drugs have
become popular as well. Androstenedione or ‘Andro’ is another popular steroid
known to be used. Human growth hormone (HGH) is also prevalent but requires
blood tests to detect, where steroids can be found through urinalysis. MLB
players are not currently tested for HGH. Lastly there is the old standby,
greenies, better known as amphetamines by those outside the sport.
I’m not
going to discuss the past transgressions of famous baseball players who have
succumbed to PEDs or have been linked to them. We know who they are and the
stories that are associated with each of them. I won’t deliberate on whether or
not they did or did not take them. Instead, we’re going to try to figure out
why, with a fairly uniform and well-tested drug enforcement policy, we still
see professional ballplayers getting caught in the web of PED use.
First, we
should review why they take the drugs in the first place. The long and short of
it is the desire to rise to the top or maintain a presence at the top of the
sport and the ease at which they can be found. Baseball players and athletes in
general, especially superior ones, have a driving energy that supersedes
anything we know as casual sports participants. Sure, we want to win when we’re
playing our pickup games, but there isn’t millions of dollars being waved
around the neighborhood park. The goal to reach star status or maintain it is
penultimate to professional ballplayers, because being seen as a superstar
leads to cash, loads and loads of cash. Once ballplayers are drafted, they have stacks of money dropped in their laps if they are among the first round selections. If not, the wealth is still within their grasp should they prove to be among the best the game has to offer. Once players reach that magnitude, there are then a select few who feel they need the boost provided by PEDs to stick around with their closest competitors or the next batch of young up and coming stars of the game. Players are measured in comparison with other players and teams use the information to decide which players they will maintain or try to sign.
Unfortunately, there are many unscrupulous PED dealers out there so finding the drugs is not an issue. Skirting the detection of the drug is the newest problem that sports organizations, including Major League Baseball faces. There are groups out there whose sole purpose is to derive ways to prevent detection of the PEDs and their proliferation is as much of an issue as the PEDs themselves.
Many people feel that the drugs make the players better performers on the field. While strength is a good quality for a ballplayer to possess, superior strength isn’t exactly a requirement for the sport. Sure, some of the PEDs do help produce stronger players, but a bulk of the benefits drawn from taking performance enhancing drugs in baseball has to do with the drugs’ ability to help recuperate and/or prevent muscle deterioration. The benefits of PEDs and their ability to help players get back from the disabled list in years’ past are well documented. I would imagine at this point if players are taking anything, the reasoning is more closely related to staying on the field, or getting back on the field versus straight muscle generation and strength gains.
The fact that there is no monetary retribution for the teams who lose a player to suspension for something they did on their own is a major problem. This is something the MLBPA would fight tooth and nail if proposed. Imagine if Cabrera had signed a multi-year contract with the Giants only to be caught after the fact. His contract is guaranteed so what does he care? He suffers some indignity for being a cheater but he’s worth millions of dollars which could have been his pursuit in the end. He’ll be able to provide for his family beyond his time on Earth, something that was not afforded to him as a child. Would an established player in the middle of a $100 million contract run the risk if he knew he could lose the remainder of his contract? As of now, once a contract is signed it is incredibly difficult for ownership to void them. It was looked into with Jason Giambi and Alex Rodriguez and ultimately left alone by the New York Yankees because they knew they would not win such a case.
|
|
No comments:
Post a Comment